Using the Bradford-Hill criteria to assess causality in the association between CHADOX1 NCOV-19 vaccine and thrombotic immune thrombocytopenia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31646/gbio.109Keywords:
Thrombosis, VITT, HITT, heparin, COVID-19, vaccine, Astrazeneca, CHADOX1 NCOV vaccine, thrombocytopeniaAbstract
The Bradford-Hill criteria are accepted criteria for assessing causality of an association. Here, the criteria were applied to the association between the CHADOX1 NCOV-19 vaccine and vaccine induced thrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VITT). All criteria for causation are met, with consistency, specificity, temporality and biological plausibility being very clearly met. Strength of association is met, but more data are required to establish the precise estimate of the association, as case ascertainment may be variable between countries, resulting in varied estimates of incidence rates from 25 to 0.5 per 100,000. (2, 4) The application of the modified Bradford-Hill criteria to VITT following CHADOX1 NCOV- vaccine strongly supports a causal relationship.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Accepted 2021-04-10
Published 2021-04-13