Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious public health concern, ranking among the top 13th causes of death globally due to a single infectious agent [1]. In 2018, 10 million global people were diagnosed with TB, with men, women, and children being affected equally [2]. People living with HIV accounted for 9% of TB cases, and there were 160 new and recurrent cases reported per 100,000 people [1,2]. Despite progress in reducing TB deaths, an estimated 47,000 deaths occurred in 2018 [3]. In Bangladesh, a low-middle-income country with a population density of 1,115.62 people per square kilometre, 357,000 individuals were diagnosed with TB, with 90,000 cases remaining undiagnosed or unreported [4,5]. HIV is one of the top five risk factors for TB in Bangladesh, with 730 (360-1200) people living with TB/HIV, of which only 67 cases were reported in 2018 [1, 5].

Global scenario

Globally, tuberculosis and HIV co-infection is a significant health concern as it negatively impacts the outcome of both diseases [6,7]. TB is an opportunistic infection that is more prevalent in people with weakened immune systems, increasing the risk of TB in people with HIV. Infection with both HIV and TB is called HIV/TB co-infection, as suggested by numerous literatures [6-10]. TB-HIV co-infection can vary from 0-15% reported in a study conducted on the people of the European Union [6]. The risk factors for TB/HIV co-infection include sex, age, smoking, intravenous drug use, CD4 count at HIV diagnosis, and HIV transmission route [6,11,12]. However, improving early detection of TB/HIV co-infection can improve treatment outcomes [8,13]. In many countries, monitoring HIV levels in TB patients is important to address the spread of HIV and provide comprehensive care to those with TB/HIV.

Bangladesh perspectives

Bangladesh has achieved significant improvements in the public health sector through the reduction of child mortality, improvement of geriatric health, control of communicable and non-communicable diseases, and effective management of the deadly COVID-19 pandemic [14-20]. According to the SDGs set forth for Bangladesh, Goal 3, Target 3.3 aims to put an end to the outbreaks of AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases by the year 2030 [21]. The diagnosis of HIV in TB patients is a challenge as a low-level epidemic, particularly in areas with limited access to healthcare and needs to prioritize the integration of TB/HIV services [22]. Previous studies indicate that the overall HIV prevalence in Bangladesh is less than 1% among most at-risk populations [23-27].

The absence of nationally representative information on the prevalence of HIV among tuberculosis patients is a critical issue in fulfilling the growing commitment to provide comprehensive HIV care, including antiretroviral therapy (ART), to individuals who are both HIV-positive and suffering from tuberculosis [25]. Testing for HIV in TB patients and their contacts often results in a high number of new diagnoses. However, often, the treatment is not offered or taken up. In Bangladesh, TB care and treatment services are integrated into the primary healthcare system, but only 17% of the estimated number of TB patients living with HIV receive ART [28]. The National AIDS/STD Program (NASP), within the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), acts as a nodal body responsible for programming to address HIV issues in the country [26]. According to WHO regional health statistics, the number of new HIV infections was 0.01 per 1,000 uninfected population and has been stable since 1990 [29]. The National TB Control Program in Bangladesh works closely with other organizations to provide high-quality, integrated TB care and prevention [26].

The country is among the world's 30th highest TB burden countries and needs information about its HIV epidemic to combat its spread [30]. This study conducted a nationally representative sero-survey to determine the prevalence of HIV infection among tuberculosis patients in Bangladesh. The study is crucial for Bangladesh to fulfil the target of the Sustainable Development Goals and increase service coverage to achieve Universal Health Coverage.

Methods

Ethical consent and permission for data collection

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC), with registration number BMRC/NREC/2019-2022/993. A brief introduction to the aims and objectives of the study was given first. Then, the written consent translated into the native language was read to illiterate tribal elderly. All collected data was kept anonymously. The design and delivery of data collection for this study continuously tried to ensure the enrolled population's rights to privacy, confidentiality, informed consent and freedom of movement. The information was kept with the highest confidentiality and was used only for this study, and privacy was maintained during data collection. The participants were given full freedom to withdraw their consent to participate at any stage of the study. The national TB program was also proactively engaged, empowering patients in study design, data collection, and service delivery to accountability.

Study setting, population, and pre-testing

This cross-sectional survey study was conducted from June 2020 to December 2021. In this design, data was collected through interviews, a questionnaire, document review, and blood sample collection. According to 1st and 2nd quarter 2020 data, a total of 100163 patients are getting treatment registered under 857 countrywide TRCs. So, the target population for this survey includes all patients suffering from tuberculosis and registered under the TB reporting centre of the National Tuberculosis Control Programme (NTP) from 1st quarter to 3rd quarter of 2020, including new diagnoses. Pre-testing was conducted by six (06) teams at the end of September 2020. A total of 81 respondents' data and biological samples were collected. Response rates were 35% in urban centres while only 100% in rural centres during pre-testing. All the samples were found to be negative for HIV.

Data Collection Technique:

After getting verbal and written consent, data was collected by trained laboratory technicians from the participants by face-to-face interviews through TAB based pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire. For the HIV test, blood was collected from the participants by following standard guidelines, and the sample was tested at the laboratory of the National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine.

Team composition

The technical committee of the survey consisted of one principal investigator, two co-principal investigators and thirteen co-investigators. Besides these, one finance and budget officer, one administrative officer, one research officer, two quality control officers, one statistician, ten field supervisors (Public Health Background) and thirty data enumerators (MT lab technician/phlebotomist) were recruited for the survey.

Training of Field Supervisors and Data Enumerators

Training of field supervisors and data enumerators was conducted in September 2020. All the training sessions were conducted by esteemed investigators, project officials, and other resource persons. The training ensured a common understanding of the terms and definitions used in the survey manual and ensured accurate data collection, tab management and good data quality. On the closing day, a feedback session about the questionnaire was arranged where the Line Director of NTP and Director of NIPSOM (Principal Investigator) graced the session.

Variables included in the study

Variables in this study were the socio-demographic variables [Age, Sex, Religion, Marital status, Education, Occupation, Family type], Co-morbidities [Diabetes, Hypertension, Kidney diseases, COPD], History of transfusion/infusion, History of any major or minor surgery, Past history, History of previous TB treatment, H/O contact with TB or HIV patients, Diagnosis-related variables, Process of TB-HIV co-infection diagnosis, Magnitude of TB-HIV co-infection in the catchment area, Notification process of TB-HIV co-infection, TB-HIV integrated service-related variables, and vulnerable group for TB-HIV co-infection according to focal persons. Respondents' HIV sero-prevalence was observed by collecting blood samples.

Selection Criteria

Inclusion Criteria were diagnosed tuberculosis patients according to the NTP diagnostic algorithm irrespective of age and sex. Participants who provided informed written or verbal consent were included in the study. The target population of the study included individuals residing in all geographical areas of the country. As this survey was under NTP, the exclusion criteria were tuberculosis patients not enrolled under NTP and patients declared as cured/treatment completed.

Sample size estimation

From general theory, the minimum required sample size is determined using the usual sample size determination formula for estimating proportion with a relative margin of error, which is given by:

Where "p" represents the prior estimated proportion of the desired characteristics in the population, "z" represents the value of a standard normal variate that provides a 100α% chance of obtaining a poor sample, "d" represents the acceptable relative margin of error, "N" is the total population size, and "deff" represents the design effect used in complex surveys that employ multi-stage cluster sampling

.

Here, we have considered p = 0.001 (according to a survey of NTP, the estimated proportion of HIV among TB patients is 0.1% [25]), q = (1-p) = 0.999, z = 1.96 and d = 0.0006 (at 0.06%). From the 2019 Annual TB report, N= Total number of TB patients in a year= 100163. Considering a 10% unavailability in the course of the study time, we have N=0.9X100163= 90488. We consider design effect=1.25.

As a result, the required sample size becomes:

The data from the first and second quarter of 2020 revealed that 100,163 patients received treatment at 857 Treatment and Recovery Centers (TRCs) across the country. After evaluating the current situation and patient recovery rate from the first quarter, it was determined that the number of patients would decrease by 10%. Based on this estimation, the expected number of patients at the field was 90,146, and the sample size was calculated to be 11,920. The final sample size was estimated to be approximately 12,000.

Sampling techniques

The survey was performed by probability-to-proportion sampling in two stages.

Stage I: Selection of TRC from 64 districts was done by probability proportion sampling (PPS) based on the list of TRCs all over the country as primary sampling units. For the first stage of PPS systematic sampling, we first determined the number of centres to be selected, assuming an average of 50 patients from each centre. In the second stage, we need 238 centres. Since in PPS systematic sampling, some centres may have missed out on the selection; we started with a 10% higher number of centres, which is 263. Attempting 263 centres, the PPS systematic sampling ended up selecting 253 centres.

Stage II: The selection of the sample patients was made through systematic random sampling from the selected TRCs, maintaining sample sizes proportional to the number of patients listed under the centre. At the same time, the second stage sampling frame was the patients' registration records. Patients were selected systematically from each TRC with an interval of 4. Neither replacement nor changes of the pre-selected TRC or patient were allowed at the implementing stage to prevent bias.

Pre-testing

Pre-testing was conducted by six (06) teams in three rural TRCs (Savar Upzilla Health Complex (UHC), Dhamrai UHC, Dhaka Export Processing Zone DOTs centre) and three from urban (Malibag BGME TRC, Lalbag TRC and Naare Maitri TRC, Mohakhali, Dhaka). Each team consists of three data enumerators led by one supervisor and two co-investigators. A total of 81 respondents were observed in pre-testing, with a response rate of 65% in urban centres and 100% in rural centres. All the samples were found to be negative for HIV. The questionnaire was then corrected and modified according to the findings after pre-testing.

Data collection

A trained data enumerators team was employed in data collection. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a pre-tested electronic TAB-based semi-structured questionnaire. A document review was done to collect treatment and investigation-related data. To observe the HIV prevalence, blood samples were collected from 12065 participants after getting their consent and were tested at NIPSOM LAB. Maintaining cold chain and taking all aseptic precautions for all respondents who gave consent, 5 ml. venous blood was collected to test HIV, upholding the standard confirmatory test by 4th generation ELISA method for detection of antibody of HIV1/2/P24 antigen. External quality assurance was done on all positive samples and 1% of negative samples in the HIV reference laboratory. Proper aseptic precautions were taken, and all the samples were coded properly during blood sample collection. The whole data collection process was supervised by the trained supervisor, and the technical committee visited the data collection field frequently to ensure valid data collection. The collected data was processed in the central office, NIPSOM, for authenticity, consistency and relevancy.

To prevent any unwanted harm or complication during the sample collection and waste management, all the phlebotomists were trained extensively to ensure their safety first. The necessary biosafety procedure for personal protective equipment was maintained properly. All kinds of logistics were provided to maintain standard procedures for sample collection. In case of any accidental hazard or damage during their work in the field, the principal investor was responsible for ensuring the proper treatment and management for both respondents and phlebotomists. In addition, as the respondents gave us their valuable 15 minutes during data collection, as compensation, a refreshment was arranged for all the respondents coming to TRCs with the help of the local authority.

Data analysis

In data analysis, we performed a frequency distribution table, different graphs, and sub-group descriptive analysis. The socio-demographic profile and co-

morbidities of the respondents were analyzed through a frequency distribution table. The prevalence of HIV among tuberculosis patients was presented in a simple bar diagram. A sub-group analysis for the HIV-positive cases was also done by descriptive statistics. All the statistical analysis was performed by SPSS-25 version

Results

Socio-demographic profile of the respondents

Among the 12,065 tuberculosis patients included in the study, the majority, 28.4% (n=3421), were 55 years and older with a mean age of 41.90 years (standard deviation=16.96), followed by <15 years 3.9% (n=469). The samples were collected from all eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh, with a maximum 25% (n=3020) TB patients from the Dhaka division, followed by 18% (n=2169) from Chattogram, 17.1% (n=2069) from Khulna, 10.0% (n=1206) from Rangpur, 9.6% (n=1159) from Sylhet, 7.1% (n=856) from Rajshahi, 7.0% (n=849) from Barisal and Mymensingh (6.1%) respectively. The majority, 75.85%, of the patients were urban residents, with 13.01% from Peri-urban and 11.14% from rural residences. More than half (56.0%) of the TB patients were male, and 43.8% were female, with a small portion (0.2%) being transgender. The majority, 82% (n=9898) of the patients were currently married, followed by 14.0% (n=1687) were unmarried, 3.4% (n=415) were widows or widowers, and 0.5% (n=65) were either separated or divorced. About 4327 (35.9%) of the TB patients were found to be illiterate, where 3081 (25.5%) had completed their primary education, 19.8% belonged to primary education, 1.5% had completed college or university, and 1.8% had completed post-graduation. The majority of the respondents were housewives (31.7%), followed by a farmer (18.4%), students (8.6%), Small business (8.3%), unemployed but able to work (6.8%) and day labourers (5.7%) respectively. The majority of the patients came from the nuclear family (70.9%), with 28.6% from joint family and a small portion (0.5%) were found out of the family (residing in hostels or mess etc.) (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Baseline characteristics Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Age group (mean age=41.90; SD=16.96; Age range: 1 to 106 years)    
<15 years 469 3.9
15-24 years 1691 14
25-34 years 2101 17.4
35-44 years 2174 18
45-54 years 2209 18.3
55+ years 3421 28.4
Division    
Barisal 849 7.04
Chattogram 2169 17.98
Dhaka 3020 25.03
Khulna 2069 17.15
Mymensingh 737 6.11
Rajshahi 856 7.09
Rangpur 1206 10
Sylhet 1159 9.61
Residence    
Rural 1344 11.14
Peri urban 1570 13.01
Urban 9151 75.85
Sex    
Male 6762 56
Female 5284 43.8
Third gender 19 0.2
Marital status    
Unmarried 1687 13.98
Currently Married 9898 82.04
Separate/Divorce 65 0.54
Widow 415 3.44
Education    
Illiterate 4327 35.86
Less than Primary 2392 19.83
Primary completed 3081 25.54
Secondary Completed 1214 10.06
Higher Secondary Completed 655 5.43
College/University Completed 181 1.5
Post-Graduate Completed 214 1.77
Not agree to discuss 1 0.01
Occupation (categories having more than 5% of proportion)    
Housewife 3827 31.7
Farmer 2214 18.4
Students 1042 8.6
Small Business 998 8.3
Unemployed but Able to work 818 6.8
Day Labors 690 5.7
Type of family    
Nuclear Family 8551 70.9
Joint 3449 28.6
Out of Family 65 0.5

Patients' type and co-morbidities

Out of 12,065 respondents, 11778 (97.6%) of them were suffering from Tuberculosis (TB) and the rest 287 (2.4%) were found to be drag resistance tuberculosis (DRTB) patients. About 6788 (57.63%) of the patients had detected TB by Bacteriologically and the rest were clinically detected. More than eight out of ten patients were suffering from at least one co-morbidity where Diabetes (n=1119, 9.27%) was the more frequent followed by Hypertension (n=430, 3.56%), Asthma (n=386, 3.20%), COPD (n=244, 2.02%), Cancer (n=8, 0.07%), heart disease (n=201, 1.67%), CKD (n=48, 0.40%) and Thalassemia (n=7, 0.06%). COVID-19 was tested by 545 patients, and 4.22% (n=23) were prevalent (Table 2).

Table 2. Patient's type and existence of co-morbidity.

Characteristics Frequency Percent
Type of patients    
TB 11778 97.62
DR-TB 287 2.38
Type of patients' detection (n=11778)    
Clinically 4990 42.37
Bacteriologically 6788 57.63
Presence of co-morbidity    
One co-morbidity 1734 83.37
Two co-morbidities 281 13.51
Three or more co-morbidities 65 3.13
Diabetes    
No 10946 90.73
Yes 1119 9.27
Hypertension    
No 11635 96.44
Yes 430 3.56
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)    
No 11821 97.98
Yes 244 2.02
Cancer    
No 12057 99.93
Yes 8 0.07
Asthma    
No 11679 96.8
Yes 386 3.2
Heart Disease    
No 11864 98.33
Yes 201 1.67
Chronic kidney disease (CKD)    
No 12017 99.6
Yes 48 0.4
Hepatitis    
No 12008 99.53
Yes 57 0.47
Thalassemia    
No 12058 99.94
Yes 7 0.06
Others co-morbidity    
No 11865 98.34
Yes 200 1.66
COVID-19 (n=545)    
Positive 23 4.22
Negative 522 95.78

Prevalence of HIV among Tuberculosis patients

A total of 12 HIV-positive cases were found among 12065 tuberculosis patients across the country. The positive cases were verified by diagnosing from another laboratory. Therefore, the HIV sero-prevalence among tuberculosis in Bangladesh is 0.1% (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Prevalence of HIV among Tuberculosis patients  

Socio-demographic profile of HIV-positive patients

Out of 12 HIV-positive cases, majority 33.3% (n=4) patients were from the age group 35-44 years, followed by 25.0%(n=3) from 45-54 years, 16.7% (n=2) from 25-34 years and above 55 years, and 8.3%(n=1) from the age group 15- 24 years. Most of the HIV-positive cases were male (n=7, 58.3%), and 5 (41.7%) were female patients. HIV prevalence was found to be higher among the lower educational group. The illiterate and less than primary group contributed 33% each (4 from each group respectively). Three HIV-positive patients had completed up-to primary education, and one patient had completed secondary education. Eight (66.7%) out of 12 patients were currently married, followed by two (16.7%) were unmarried, one patient (8.3%) was separated or divorced, and one (8.3%) was a widow. The HIV-positive patients' occupations were private service (n=1, 8.3%), small business (n=1, 8.3%), farmer (n=1, 8.3%), day labourers (n=2, 16.7%), transport labour (n=2, 16.7%), housewife (n=4, 33.3%) and others (n=1, 8.3%). Nine (75%) HIV-positive patients were from the nuclear family, and three (25%) were from joint families, where the majority (n=8, 66.6%) were from urban residents (Table 3).

Table 3. Socio-demographic characteristics of the HIV positive patients

  Frequency Percentage
Age group    
15-24 years 1 8.3
25-34 years 2 16.7
35-44 years 4 33.3
45-54 years 3 25
Above 55 years 2 16.7
Gender    
Male 7 58.3
Female 5 41.7
Education    
Illiterate 4 33.3
Less than Primary 4 33.3
Primary completed 3 25
Secondary completed 1 8.3
Marital status    
Unmarried 2 16.7
Currently Married 8 66.7
Separate/Divorce 1 8.3
Widow 1 8.3
Occupation    
Private Service 1 8.3
Small Business 1 8.3
Farmer 1 8.3
Day Labors 2 16.7
Transport Labor 2 16.7
Housewife 4 33.3
Others 1 8.3
Family type    
Nuclear Family 9 75
Joint 3 25
Residence    
Peri Urb 2 16.67
Rural 2 16.67
Urban 8 66.66

HIV-positive patients' surgery history, contact with TB or DRTB history and their detection method

All the HIV-positive patients had co-infection with TB, and no one progressed to DR-TB. Three patients (25%) had a history of major or minor surgery, two (16.7%) had a history of close contact with TB or DRTB patient, ten (83.3%) had pulmonary involvement TB, seven bacteriologically (58.3%) detected, and nine (75.0%) were negative in both smear test and gene expert (Table 4).

Table 4. Distribution of the HIV-positive cases according to their surgery history and close contact with TB or DRTB history and different detection methods (n=12).

Variables Frequency Percent
Type of TB    
TB 12 100
DR-TB 0 0
History of major/minor surgery    
Yes 3 25
No 9 75
History of contact with TB or DRTB patient    
Yes 2 16.7
No 7 58.3
Do not Know 3 25
Pulmonary involvement    
Pulmonary 10 83.3
Extra pulmonary 2 16.7
Detection methods    
Clinically 5 41.7
Bacteriologically 7 58.3
Smear test    
Smear positive 3 25
Smear negative 9 75
Gene expert test    
Gene expert positive 3 25
Gene expert negative 9 75

Discussion

The prevalence of HIV among tuberculosis patients is unknown in Bangladesh. With the support of the National Tuberculosis Control Program (NTP), AIDS/STD Program (ASP), Directorate General of Health Services, Bangladesh, and the National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Dhaka initiated the conduct of this study financially supported by Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM). For this, a nationally representative 12,065 tuberculosis patients were selected as a sample that provides important insights into the demographic and clinical characteristics of tuberculosis (TB) patients in Bangladesh, as well as the prevalence of HIV among TB patients.

The study found that a significant proportion of TB patients were aged 55 years and older, with a mean age of 41.90 years, which is consistent with other studies that have found TB to be more prevalent among older age groups [31,32]. However, a small proportion of TB patients were under the age of 15, which may indicate the need for targeted interventions to prevent and treat TB in children. It was also observed that TB patients were more prevalent in urban areas. Numerous studies have found TB to be more prevalent in urban areas due to factors such as overcrowding and poor living conditions [33-36]. Additionally, illiteracy was the frequent educational status among TB patients, which is consistent with other studies that have found low levels of education to be a risk factor for TB [37-39].

The study also found a high prevalence of co-morbidities among TB patients, with diabetes being the most common. This is evident in other studies that have found diabetes to be a major risk factor for TB [40-42]. Additionally, the study found a low prevalence of drug-resistant TB in Bangladesh. The Government of Bangladesh has taken numerous strategies to control TB [43]. The lower prevalence of drug-resistant TB may reflect the success of TB control programs in Bangladesh in preventing the spread of drug-resistant strains.

The study also provides important insights into the prevalence of HIV among TB patients in Bangladesh, with a seroprevalence of 0.1%. This is lower than the global average HIV prevalence among TB patients. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), globally, approximately 8% of TB patients are co-infected with HIV [32]. However, this co-infection rate varies widely by region and population group. In sub-Saharan Africa, both TB and HIV co-infection are highly prevalent and can vary from 50% to 75% [44,45]. Similarly, another study found that the prevalence of HIV among TB patients can vary from 3.8 to 72.3% [9]. In some regions with lower rates of both diseases, the co-infection rate may be much lower. For example, numerous studies conducted in Canada found that only 1.2 to 6.5% of TB patients were also infected with HIV [46,47]. The lower prevalence of HIV among TB patients was also found to be less than 1% in Pakistan [48,49], 1.5% in Somalia [50], 5.54 to 9% in India [51-53], 9.9% in Nepal [12] and less than 1% in China [10].

It was found that HIV prevalence was higher among the lower educational group, with illiterate and less than primary education groups contributing the most. The majority of the HIV-positive patients were male, and most of them were currently married. Housewives accounted for the most common occupation among the positive patients. Additionally, all HIV-positive patients were also TB patients, with most of them having pulmonary involvement TB. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown higher HIV prevalence among individuals with lower education and socio-economic status [12,40,54]. It is also well-established that men are at a higher risk of HIV infection compared to women, particularly in countries with high HIV prevalence [44,45].

The results suggest that HIV prevalence was nil among DR-TB patients, indicating a high prevalence of HIV/TB co-infection and difficulty in treating this form of the disease. Regarding the medical history of the patients, a small percentage had a history of surgery, and two patients had close contact with TB or DR-TB patients, which could be contributing factors to the development of TB. Additionally, the majority of HIV-positive patients had pulmonary TB, and bacteriological detection was found in over half of the patients. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown a high prevalence of HIV/TB co-infection, particularly in areas with a high burden of both diseases, such as sub-Saharan Africa [55]. Furthermore, previous research has shown that HIV-positive individuals are at an increased risk of developing TB, with a higher incidence of pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB compared to HIV-negative individuals [56]. The lack of DR-TB among HIV-positive TB patients is a positive outcome, as DR-TB can be more difficult and costly to treat than drug-susceptible TB. However, the findings emphasize the importance of integrated HIV/TB services and the need for targeted interventions to prevent and manage HIV/TB co-infection. It is important to note that the co-infection rate among TB patients is an important public health concern, as HIV-positive individuals are at higher risk of developing active TB disease. The study recommends that all TB patients be offered HIV testing, and HIV-positive TB patients should receive antiretroviral therapy in addition to TB treatment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the prevalence of HIV is lower than one percent. The low prevalence of HIV among TB patients in Bangladesh underscores the importance of targeted interventions to prevent the progress of HIV infection to AIDS, acquiring new TB infection and promoting both the progression of latent TB infection to active disease and relapse of the disease in previously treated patients. Special attentions are needed among patients, particularly among older age groups, urban residents, and those with co-morbidities such as diabetes.

References

1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Global Health Topics: Tuberculosis. CDC: Global Tuberculosis Fact Sheets. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/newsroom/topics/tb/index.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2023.

3. Tajmim T. The battle gets tougher to fight drug resistant TB. The Business Standard. 2020.https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/health/battle-gets-tougher-fight-drug-resistant-tb-47151. Accessed 11 Feb 2023.

4. Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates. Population density (people per sq. km of land area) - Bangladesh. The World Bank. 2023. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.DNST?locations=BD . Accessed 11 Feb 2023.

5. The New Age. TB kills 129 per day in Bangladesh. The New Age. 2020.

6. Pimpin L, Drumright LN, Kruijshaar ME, Abubakar I, Rice B, Delpech V, et al. Tuberculosis and HIV co-infection in European Union and European Economic Area countries. European Respiratory Journal. 2011;38:1382. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00198410.

7. Venturini E, Turkova A, Chiappini E, Galli L, de Martino M, Thorne C. Tuberculosis and HIV co-infection in children. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:S5. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-S1-S5.

8. Ali SA, Mavundla TR, Fantu R, Awoke T. Outcomes of TB treatment in HIV co-infected TB patients in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional analytic study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:640. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1967-3.

9. Belay M, Bjune G, Abebe F. Prevalence of tuberculosis, HIV, and TB-HIV co-infection among pulmonary tuberculosis suspects in a predominantly pastoralist area, northeast Ethiopia. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:27949. PubMed https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27949.

10. Gao J, Zheng P, Fu H. Prevalence of TB/HIV Co-Infection in Countries Except China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64915-. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064915.

11. Qi C-C, Xu L-R, Zhao C-J, Zhang H-Y, Li Q-Y, Liu M-J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of tuberculosis among people living with HIV/AIDS in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23:584. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08575-4.

12. Adhikari N, Bhattarai RB, Basnet R, Joshi LR, Tinkari BS, Thapa A, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors for tuberculosis among people living with HIV in Nepal. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0262720-. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262720.

13. Bruchfeld J, Correia-Neves M, Källenius G. Tuberculosis and HIV Coinfection. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5:a017871–a017871. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a017871.

14. Hossain MS, Tasnim S, Chowdhury MA, Chowdhury FIF, Hossain D, Rahman MM. Under-five children's acute respiratory infection dropped significantly in Bangladesh: An evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey, 1996–2018. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics. 2022;111:1981–1994. PubMed.

15. Paul GK, Rahman MM, Naznin S, Chowdhury M, Uddin MJ. Depression and Anxiety among University Students: A Comparison between COVID-19 Pandemic Panic Period and Post-panic Period in Bangladesh. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10 E SE-Public Health Epidemiology:52–9.

16. Islam MdZ, Disu TR, Farjana S, Rahman MM. Malnutrition and other risk factors of geriatric depression: a community-based comparative cross-sectional study in older adults in rural Bangladesh. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:572. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02535-w.

17. Paul GK, Rahman MM, Hamiduzzaman M, Farhana Z, Mondal SK, Akter S, et al. Hypertension and its physio-psychosocial risks factors in elderly people: a cross-sectional study in north-eastern region of Bangladesh. Journal of geriatric cardiology. 2021;18:75–82. PubMed.

18. Siddiqee MH, Bhattacharjee B, Siddiqi UR, Rahman MM. High prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among South Asian pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition. 2021;1–12. PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34725002/.

19. Haque MF, Rahman MM, Alif SM, Akter E, Barua S, Paul GK, et al. Estimation and prediction of doubling time for COVID-19 epidemic in Bangladesh: a modelling study of first 14 month's daily confirmed new cases and deaths. Global Biosecurity. 2021;3.

20. Rahman MM, Bhattacharjee B, Farhana Z, Hamiduzzaman M, Chowdhury MAB, Hossain MS, et al. Age-related Risk Factors and Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prev Med Hyg. 2021;62:E329–E329. PubMed.

21. UN Sustainable Development. The Sustainable Development Goals in Bangladesh. United Nations: Bangladesh. 2022.

22. Geneva: World Health Organization. Roadmap towards ending TB in children and adolescents, 2nd ed. 2018.

23. Mominur Rahman Md, Islam F, Saidur Rahaman Md, Sultana NA, Fahim NF, Ahmed M. Studies on the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in Bangladesh including other developing countries. Advances in Traditional Medicine. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-021-00610-6.

24. Sheikh MdT, Uddin MdN, Khan JR. A comprehensive analysis of trends and determinants of HIV/AIDS knowledge among the Bangladeshi women based on Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys, 2007–2014. Archives of Public Health. 2017;75:59. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0228-2

25. National Tuberculosis Control Program, National AIDS/STD Program, World Health Organization. National Guidelines on TB/HIV Management Program Collaboration & Implementation Manual: Second Edition 2016. Dhaka; 2016.

26. National AIDS/STD Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare B. National HIV Testing Services (HTS) Guideline. Dhaka; 2019.

27. Sarwar G, Reza M, Khan MNM, Gourab G, Rahman M, Rana AKMM, et al. Developing and testing community-based tuberculosis (TB) screening intervention to increase TB referral, case detection and knowledge among sexual minority people in urban Bangladesh: a mixed-method study protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e037371. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037371.

28. Porskrog A, Bjerregaard-Andersen M, Oliveira I, Joaquím LC, Camara C, Andersen PL, et al. Enhanced tuberculosis identification through 1-month follow-up of smear-negative tuberculosis suspects. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2011;15:459–64. PubMed https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.10.0353.

29. World Health Organization. Data: Health data overview for the People's Republic of Bangladesh. 2022. https://data.who.int/countries/050. Accessed 11 Jun 2024.

30. Nazneen A, Tarannum S, Chowdhury KIA, Islam MT, Islam SMH, Ahmed S, et al. Implementation status of national tuberculosis infection control guidelines in Bangladeshi hospitals. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0246923-. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246923.

31. Lönnroth Mario KR. Global Epidemiology of Tuberculosis: Prospects for Control. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:481–91. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085700.

32. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2020. 2020.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131.

33. Mutembo S, Mutanga JN, Musokotwane K, Kanene C, Dobbin K, Yao X, et al. Urban-rural disparities in treatment outcomes among recurrent TB cases in Southern Province, Zambia. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:1087. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4709-5.

34. Sarker M, Homayra F, Rawal LB, Kabir R, Aftab A, Bari R, et al. Urban-rural and sex differentials in tuberculosis mortality in Bangladesh: results from a population-based survey. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2019;24:109–15. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13171.

35. Hossain S, Quaiyum MA, Zaman K, Banu S, Husain MA, Islam MA, et al. Socio Economic Position in TB Prevalence and Access to Services: Results from a Population Prevalence Survey and a Facility-Based Survey in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44980-. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044980.

36. Abubakar I, Crofts JP, Gelb D, Story A, Andrews N, Watson JM. Investigating urban–rural disparities in tuberculosis treatment outcome in England and Wales. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:122–7. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268807008333.

37. Shimeles E, Enquselassie F, Aseffa A, Tilahun M, Mekonen A, Wondimagegn G, et al. Risk factors for tuberculosis: A case–control study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214235-. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214235.

38. Narasimhan P, Wood J, MacIntyre CR, Mathai D. Risk Factors for Tuberculosis. Pulm Med. 2013;2013:828939. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/828939.

39. Gelaw Y, Williams G, Soares Magalhães RJ, Gilks CF, Assefa Y. HIV Prevalence Among Tuberculosis Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2019;23:1561–75. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-02386-4.

40. Dobler CC, Flack JR, Marks GB. Risk of tuberculosis among people with diabetes mellitus: an Australian nationwide cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000666. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000666.

41. Faurholt-Jepsen D, Range N, PrayGod G, Jeremiah K, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Aabye MG, et al. Diabetes Is a Risk Factor for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Case-Control Study from Mwanza, Tanzania. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24215-. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024215.

42. Stevenson CR, Forouhi NG, Roglic G, Williams BG, Lauer JA, Dye C, et al. Diabetes and tuberculosis: the impact of the diabetes epidemic on tuberculosis incidence. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:234. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-234.

43. National Tuberculosis Control Programme (NTP). National strategic plan-public-private mix in tuberculosis, 2016-2020. 2016.

44. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report. 2014. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564809.

45. Gelaw YA, Williams G, Soares Magalhães RJ, Gilks CF, Assefa Y. HIV Prevalence Among Tuberculosis Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2019;23:1561–75. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-02386-4.

46. Harris T, Panaro L, Phypers M, Choudhri Y, Archibald CP. HIV Testing among Canadian Tuberculosis Cases from 1997 to 1998. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. 2006;17:156. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/321765.

47. Health Canada. Tuberculosis in Canada, 2020. 2022. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/tuberculosis-canada-2020-infographic.html.

48. Wali A, Khan D, Safdar N, Shawani Z, Fatima R, Yaqoob A, et al. Prevalence of tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and hepatitis; in a prison of Balochistan: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1631. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8011-7.

49. Hasnain J, Memon GN, Memon A, Channa AA, Creswell J, Shah SA. Screening for HIV among tuberculosis patients: a cross-sectional study in Sindh, Pakistan. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001677. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001677.

50. Dirie AMH, Çolakoğlu S, Abdi BM, Shire AM, Abdinur AH. The prevalence of HIV among tuberculosis patients in Benadir, Somalia. Retrospective multi-center study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2022;78:103793. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103793.

51. Sawant SS, Agrawal SR, Shastri JS, Pawaskar M, Kadam P. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Among Tuberculosis Patients in Mumbai. J Lab Physicians. 2011;3:012–4.

52. Khangarot S, Kumar N, Kumawat R. Human immunodeficiency virus infection amongst newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients and their clinico-radiological profile: A prospective study from Western India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020, 31;9(5):2475-2479. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_121_20.

53. Gothi D, Joshi JM. Clinical and laboratory observations of tuberculosis at a Mumbai (India) clinic. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:97–100. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.2003.008185.

54. Dahab M, Charalambous S, Hamilton R, Fielding K, Kielmann K, Churchyard GJ, et al. "That is why I stopped the ART": Patients' & providers' perspectives on barriers to and enablers of HIV treatment adherence in a South African workplace programme. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:63. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-63.

55. UNAIDS. AIDSinfo. 2019. https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/. Accessed 19 Feb 2023.

56. Barr DA, Lewis JM, Feasey N, Schutz C, Kerkhoff AD, Jacob ST, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis bloodstream infection prevalence, diagnosis, and mortality risk in seriously ill adults with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:742–52. PubMed https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30695-4.